Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 10 Aug 1999 19:52:24 +0900 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Tom Barrett writes:
>I have recently come across the following headings used by a Queen Breeder
>to assess his queens for breeding purposes.
>
>1. Docility (non Jumping, Non Stinging, Non Following)
>2. Steadiness On Comb (Absence Of Running)
>3. Brood Pattern (Compactness Of Brood, Absence Of Empty Cells)
>4. Pollen Storage (Pollen Packed Over, Around And Under The Broodnest)
>5. Comb Building (Speed In Occupying Supers, Drawing Foundation, Honey
>Storage And Quality Of Comb Capping)
>
>Each heading is given a rating of 0 to 5.
>
>Strangely enough there is nothing in the list about foraging ability.
>
Presumably the breeder queens have been selected from the production hives
on the basis of the honey produced. The assessment is then based on
additional factors. I would tend to rate the first 3 factors as more
relevant than the final 2. After some years of queen breeding, I understand
(not having reached this stage myself) that it becomes difficult to
distinguish the best and points 4 and 5 may then be worth taking into
consideration INMHO.
Betty McAdam.
HOG BAY APIARY
Penneshaw, Kangaroo Island
J.H. & E. McAdam<[log in to unmask]
http://kigateway.kin.on.net/hogbay/hogbay1.htm
Why not visit the South Australian Superb Websites Ring?
http://kw.mtx.net/sawebring/sawebring.html
|
|
|