Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 16 Nov 1999 07:36:11 -0500 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
John wrote:
The significance of a counted drop is for integrated pest management
practices. One of the underlying principles of IPM is that a certain amount
of infestation by a pest is normal.
Reply:
Trouble is, what is the number? Is it 20 per day? Twenty
mites from a strong hive is different from 20 from a nuc, obviously.
Depends on the time of year, too. Varroa is essentially a fatal
disease, and all the hives seem to have it.
Researchers are scrambling to find non-chemical alternatives,
but most of these aren't really working yet. I wouldn't play with
this one any more than I would play with AFB. Let the researchers
play with it.
In terms of integrated pest management, I would suggest
developing a plan to create enough nucs so that any hive that has
excessive mites in the fall can get a nuc with a new queen. You
remove the hive's queen and introduce the nuc over newspaper. (This
would be in addition to strips.)
The population of mites has to be knocked down. I don't
think it can be eliminated by any known method. The worst part is
that the population skyrockets during the honey flow. If researchers
could find a non-toxic treatment that could be applied during the
flow, maybe pesticides could be eliminated.
PB
Peter Borst
[log in to unmask]
http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/plb6/
|
|
|