I would have thought logical-positivist because it is basically Carl
Hemple's view isn't it.
Iain Stuart
> -----Original Message-----
> From: geoff carver [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Sunday,21 November, 1999 0:41
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: need help for a quote/label
>
> when someone talks about "reproducibility" as being a criterion for
> something
> being science or not (as in "archaeology is not a science because you
> can only
> excavate the site once", and as opposed to popper and his
> falsifiability), just
> what is that school-of-thought/argument called? neo-positivist?
> neo-rationalist?
>
> geoff carver
> http://home.t-online.de/home/gcarver/
> [log in to unmask]