BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Harry Goudie <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 7 Oct 1999 19:20:59 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
> The policy of burning and burying the contents of infected hives combined
> with a compensation scheme financed by the beekeepers themselves has
enabled
> the UK to reduce the incidence of AFB to about 1% and keep it at that
> seemingly irreducible level for many years.

I suppose this 1% will be due to feral colonies and colonies which have not
been reported with the disease.
Is there actually a law which states that foulbrood must be reported?  I ask
this because it does not seem to be the case for varroa.  In the case of
varroa there seems to be no obligation to either report or to treat an
infestation.

Harry

ATOM RSS1 RSS2