Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - BEE-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
BEE-L Home BEE-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Smoke to get mite drop
From:
John and Angie Partin <a&[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 3 Sep 1999 13:13:34 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
I hope this isn't the archives! It has been reported that grapefruit
leaves are also an effective mite drop tool. Sorry for the hearsay but, I
can't remember the source of this report.

I have a hard time not responding to messages even though I have no source.
Must you have the source to throw new information in the discussion? Isn't
it a mistake to discount new information just because the informer doesn't
have a study to back it up? Won't it make people with valuable information
hesitant to share it if they're afraid someone is going to publicly ridicule
it. And finally, what if a subject has been covered in the archives, does
that mean you can't get new information from new beekeepers who weren't on
the BEE-L when the subject was discussed the first time around?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV