HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Kimmel, Richard H SAW" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 19 Aug 1999 13:42:34 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
Good Point re Sec 106.  36 CFR 800 rewrite requires a lot of public
involvement.  I don't know what others are doing but federal agencies are
supposed to be notifying Native American interests (of course) as well as
the interested public.  I am assuming we find these people by notifying
archaeological societies and professional organizations (personally, I don't
want to print the locations of significant sites in the local newspaper).  I
know, some sites will still not get the attention they deserve and any 106
action results in at least some selectivity and lost data.  The Advisory
Council and SHPOs deserve a lot of credit for putting so much emphasis on
communication in the new regs (despite the fact that it's more work for me).

ATOM RSS1 RSS2