Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 22 Jan 2001 07:21:56 -0500 |
MIME-version: |
1.0 |
Content-type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Rich Green wrote:
>There is no technology in dowsing. It is little more than redneck
>voodoo. Hume also suggested that coat hangers were a better choice than
>metal detectors. I doubt if anyone gives much credence to that
>assertion.
>
>Surely, you're not asking a serious question with regard to dowsing?
Yes, I am asking a serious question.
Mr. Noel Hume is not the only reliable authority to mention dowsing
as a potentially serious technology. Even if the suggestion had come
from a lesser figure, serious suggestions deserve to be honored.
I don't know why it works, how it works, or even if it works. I
merely asked if anyone has given it an open-minded test. We're in
pretty bad shape if we can dismiss ideas as "redneck voodoo" without
reasonable test and review.
So, please, does anyone have serious answers?
--
*****[log in to unmask]******
* *
* Compost is nature's *
* way of thanking us *
* for not trashing *
* the world with more *
* unnecessary and *
* worthless landfills.*
* --Thanks very mulch *
************************
|
|
|