Content-transfer-encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 26 Apr 2000 23:05:04 +0200 |
MIME-version: |
1.0 |
Content-type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hello,
As French student i can testify : here, most of the times, archeology is
associated with Art History. The marriage with anthropology doesn't exist
because, moreover, that last science is incorporated in Sociology
Luc
University of Poitiers
----- Original Message -----
From: geoff carver <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2000 9:44 PM
Subject: Re: Please Reply
> apologies for either cross-posting or sending to the wrong list (as in i'm
not
> sure where this came from):
>
> Jeff Ferguson schrieb:
> > Robert,
> > I agree with Carl, but to my knowledge, archaeology within
anthropology is
> > mainly an american creation. I could be wrong, but most European
> > archaeology departments (especially British) are seperate from
anthropology,
> > and associate more with the natural sciences. Looking into British
> > archaeological history may provide an interesting comparison.
> > Good Luck,
> > Jeff Ferguson
> >
> >
> go back to trigger's "history of archaeological thought" for the
difference
> between "historical archaeology" in europe and "anthropological
archaeology" in
> the americas...
>
> geoff carver
> http://home.t-online.de/home/gcarver/
> [log in to unmask]
|
|
|