HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Date:
Wed, 26 Apr 2000 21:44:52 +0200
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject:
From:
geoff carver <[log in to unmask]>
X-cc:
Content-transfer-encoding:
8BIT
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
apologies for either cross-posting or sending to the wrong list (as in i'm not
sure where this came from):

Jeff Ferguson schrieb:
> Robert,
>   I agree with Carl, but to my knowledge, archaeology within anthropology is
> mainly an american creation.  I could be wrong, but most European
> archaeology departments (especially British) are seperate from anthropology,
> and associate more with the natural sciences.  Looking into British
> archaeological history may provide an interesting comparison.
> Good Luck,
> Jeff Ferguson
>
>
go back to trigger's "history of archaeological thought" for the difference
between "historical archaeology" in europe and "anthropological archaeology" in
the americas...

geoff carver
http://home.t-online.de/home/gcarver/
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2