HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: need help for a quote/label
From:
Iain Stuart <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 21 Nov 1999 20:59:45 +1100
MIME-version:
1.0
Content-type:
text/plain
Reply-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines) 
I would have thought logical-positivist because it is basically Carl
Hemple's view isn't it.

Iain Stuart

> -----Original Message-----
> From: geoff carver [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Sunday,21 November, 1999 0:41
> To:   [log in to unmask]
> Subject:      need help for a quote/label
>
> when someone talks about "reproducibility" as being a criterion for
> something
> being science or not (as in "archaeology is not a science because you
> can only
> excavate the site once", and as opposed to popper and his
> falsifiability), just
> what is that school-of-thought/argument called? neo-positivist?
> neo-rationalist?
>
> geoff carver
> http://home.t-online.de/home/gcarver/
> [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2