HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Date:
Sat, 20 Nov 1999 14:40:39 +0100
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject:
From:
geoff carver <[log in to unmask]>
Content-transfer-encoding:
8BIT
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (9 lines)
when someone talks about "reproducibility" as being a criterion for something
being science or not (as in "archaeology is not a science because you can only
excavate the site once", and as opposed to popper and his falsifiability), just
what is that school-of-thought/argument called? neo-positivist? neo-rationalist?

geoff carver
http://home.t-online.de/home/gcarver/
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2