Denis Fodor ([log in to unmask]) wrote:
>Striving for a definition of art, something demanded of Leighton Gill by
>Don Satz, Deryk Barker gives it the following try:
>
>>How about "the organisation of sound"?
>
>Also seems to define "language".
Really? Then what, pray, are we using to communicate with here?
Deryk Barker
[log in to unmask]