Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Thu, 15 Jul 1999 15:15:50 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Wilson Pereira wrote:
>Mr. Constantini expressed about a month ago the point of view that
>he wouldn't recommend a recording of the Romanian conductor Sergiu
>Celibidache, even not listening to any of his very few recordings. Now he
>says that conductors like Jeffrey Tate can't be called conductors because
>of his spinal desease and because of his homosexualy. From time to time I
>see this kind of thing in this list. I would like to say that this trend
>is totally out of date. Why people insist on this fallacy?
Well,about Celibedache,that is my opinion. About Jeffrey Tate,i think
Wilson didn't read carefully my E-mail. I never said Tate can't be a
conductor. And to be clear,i have nothing about his conducting,because
he is or not homosexual,or handiccaped. I was speaking about the
"Trascendental" meaning of the word "Maestro".The real meaning of the word
"Trascendental" in every language on the earth,is related to the hidden
meaning of a word,it implies the "esoteric" wich is the real significance
of the things wich are cover by the forms. In that world,a "Maestro" can
not have any major handicapp.(of course i am speaking about the handicapps
of that context). I am clarifying this because i received a private E-Mail
from a person who feel ofended by my opinions.I thing now is clear.Is
nothing personal,is just an explanation of a meaning of a word. An about
the term fallacy,for me is not a fallacy. Cordially:
Geardo:.
|
|
|