Sender: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 24 Feb 1999 13:06:39 -0700 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-transfer-encoding: |
7BIT |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Organization: |
The Beekeepers |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> I believe you must use a screen to ensure that the bees do not clean
> out the debris as is their wont. I understand that it is important that
> the mite fall count be accurate, since treatment is dependent on mite
> fall and time of year.... Place a sheet of plywood under the screen to
> which you have affixed a sheet of paper
Well, we have been using White Koroplast(r) and Pam(r). which are a
plastic imitation of corrugated cardboard and a spray cooking oil
respectively.
'The Koroplast can be wiped and re-used any number of times, and the Pam
is liquid enough to come off easily. We have been laying a sheet of 6
mesh hardware cloth over the board and pushing it into the entrance.
Nonetheless, I am wondering how much bees removing debris is going to
affect the results, and if it is predictable -- at least on an overall
average basis. Since we are dealing with -- or hope to, if we can
simplify the process -- large numbers. Obtaining individual hive results
are not important to us.
The screen is the major nuisance and expense in the project. Moreover, we
heard a recent case where a respected authority fooled himself into
thinking a clean operation had mites by re-using a screen that may have
had a varroa or two hung up in it.
So, I am asking the inventive enquiring minds here on BEE-L if they think
I could somehow eliminate the screen -- or greatly simplify the screens.
Allen
---
Newsflash! Visit http://www.beekeeping.co.nz/beel.htm
to search BEE-L archives the easy, easy way or to
update or change your subscription options.
---
|
|
|