Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 1 Dec 1999 07:04:02 -0500 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Tuesday, November 23, Allen Dick wrote:
...
> Then the question is whether Apistan is working, and how well. There are
> a number of ways, and the simplest is likely to just get some Apistan(r)
> and insert it for a day or two and track the mite drop numbers. Then
> remove it and try an alternate method... CheckMite, is available and
> effective and not closely related to Apistan, so it would be a logical
> choice....
Continuing my crusade against this never gas derivative I feel compelled to
share a recommendation from Cornell University, which is to do a
post-Apistantreatment ether roll to see if mites are still present. Only if
the ether roll is positive should resort to coumophos.
Aaron Morris - thinking there's nasty stuff brewing!
|
|
|