Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Tue, 25 May 1999 16:27:46 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Walter Meyer asks:
>Aside from the undisputed fact that a harpsichord has a sound completely
>different from that of a piano, what exactly is the distinction between a
>two-keyboard and a one-keyboard instrument when both are played by a person
>w/ only two hands?
Well, first off, it's possible to arrange for the two keyboards to sound
different, thus giving a contrasting tone color to the two parts, or
"hands".
Secondly, there is much less physical difficulty with crossing hands, so
the one hand could go "chicky-chicky-chicky" all over the place, while
the other goes "bonk, bonk, bonk" all over the place also. It is very
difficult to chicky and bonk at the same time on a piano.
Someone was, at least for a short time, incensed about the whole
two-keyboard idea. There is no reason to criticise piano versions of
harpsichord music just because the stuff wasn't originally written for
piano. Well, what if we had TWO-KEYBOARD PIANOS? Matter of fact, why don't
they make them? I wonder whether piano fans will love or hate two-keyboard
pianos? (Piano fans are very unpredictable, generally, except for liking
pianos.)
Arch
|
|
|