BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Ken Hoare <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 2 Mar 1999 14:00:09 -0000
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
David Eyre stated that angry bees are maybe just better robbers, couldn't
agree more, and after their pillaging sessions return home with maybe more
than a stomach full of honey, i.e. varroa mites.
 
All possible, but more likely that his colonies have been invaded by local
collapsing colonies, both feral and the -- look in the brood box every Leap
Year beekeeper, missed it, will have to wait another four years -- managed
one's. I think that's the experience of the UK and before that on the
continent.
 
If there are mites in the area for robbers to collect a few hundred,
collapsing colonies will quickly import many, many thousands.
 
Doesn't alter the fact that angry bees are no good to anyone, well at least
not in a densely populated area such as the UK.
 
Ken Hoare

ATOM RSS1 RSS2