Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sun, 14 Feb 1999 16:55:02 EST |
Content-transfer-encoding: |
7bit |
Content-type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Gail cites an article as saying:
<< "temporary interruption of BF and
substitution with formula" is advocated by the AAP as one therapeutic
option for jaundice associated with breastfeeding. (Paraphrasing now)
therefore they are doing this study to we'll know which formula to switch
to -"This knowlege could potentially allow infants to get back to
breastfeeding faster". >>
Interesting thought. If bf is the norm, and bo fdg is abnormal, and brfd
babies have higher bili levels than bo fdg infants (assuming no pathology, and
bf appropriate), then wouldn't it stand to reason that an increased bili level
is also NORMAL and not to be treated? Especially with taking baby off the
breast and giving formula?
Sigh.
One does wonder what people did before they invented a cure for "yellow
jaundice" a la bililights. They had to invent a disease.....
Jan Barger -- who has been in health care long enough to see the swings of the
pendulum in treating bilis, and am glad that in her area, at least, they
aren't treating them at 10 and 11 on day 3 like they used to...
|
|
|