BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Jim & Sue Maus <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 4 Feb 1999 13:53:21 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Hi
Its with interest I have followed the thread about Buckfast bee's
and in particular Weaver's. I have used their Buckfasts for several
seasons and have never had any bad tempered ones and they produce
very well.
  However in asking Mr. Binford Weaver about them  the next spring
after Brother Adams death he related to me they no longer received
drone semen from the abbey. He said it came from a buckfast breeder
in Belgium. Perhaps I misunderstood him on this.  However Danny in
his rebuttal did not address the fact   if they were yet affiliated
with the abbey or not.  Only cited the past relationship. The
Canadian producers are yet in fact affiliated with the program.  I
would suggest  lest we misunderstand that the Weaver's should
clarify if they indeed are yet involved with the abbey program.
They do yet collect the $1.00 royalty on each queen..........but
does it go to the abbey or not??
  Just a few valid questions I think.  They do have excellent stock
I will say in their defense.  I have always been pleased.
 
  Jim Maus

ATOM RSS1 RSS2