As opposed to the past weeks discussion of archaeology saints?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: MacLeod, Heather [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Thursday, 14 December, 2000 1:49 PM
> To:   [log in to unmask]
> Subject:      Re: the end of the world as we know it?
>
> "historic" or "historical"....I agree with Tim, I do feel the thread
> digressing somewhat from the whole HISTARCH vein.
> Just my 2 cents worth...
> Heather
>
> > ----------
> > From:         Austin, Stephen P
> > SWF[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> > Reply To:     HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY
> > Sent:         Thursday, December 14, 2000 1:01 PM
> > To:   [log in to unmask]
> > Subject:      Re: the end of the world as we know it?
> >
> > "Historical Archaeology" Tim.  That was decided at the first SHA meeting
> > ;-)
> >
> > Stephen P. Austin
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Timothy K. Perttula [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 11:41 AM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: the end of the world as we know it?
> >
> >
> > In a message dated 12/14/00 11:39:20 AM, [log in to unmask] writes:
> >
> > << Are you mad? We should be thinking about how long umemployment will
> > stretch
> > under the RepubliKans. >>
> >
> > We ought to be thinking about something having to do with historic
> > archeology...?
> >