HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"MacLeod, Heather" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 14 Dec 2000 13:48:59 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
"historic" or "historical"....I agree with Tim, I do feel the thread
digressing somewhat from the whole HISTARCH vein.
Just my 2 cents worth...
Heather

> ----------
> From:         Austin, Stephen P
> SWF[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Reply To:     HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY
> Sent:         Thursday, December 14, 2000 1:01 PM
> To:   [log in to unmask]
> Subject:      Re: the end of the world as we know it?
>
> "Historical Archaeology" Tim.  That was decided at the first SHA meeting
> ;-)
>
> Stephen P. Austin
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Timothy K. Perttula [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 11:41 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: the end of the world as we know it?
>
>
> In a message dated 12/14/00 11:39:20 AM, [log in to unmask] writes:
>
> << Are you mad? We should be thinking about how long umemployment will
> stretch
> under the RepubliKans. >>
>
> We ought to be thinking about something having to do with historic
> archeology...?
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2