Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Sun, 7 Feb 1999 11:25:28 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
<01be521f$afd099a0$LocalHost@cahaba> |
Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Linda,
Bernie's version is what I remember hearing at the time. With a couple
small additions...it was (I was told by someone who should have known)
that the protesters were a very small number of employees and, in
addition, I do not think it was a public exhibit...it was a small exhibit
somewhere within the library available for viewing primarily by employees
and visiting researchers or something like that. Frankly, I am not
surprised that the book didn't create more of a stir.
Dan Mouer
Virginia Commonwealth University
[log in to unmask]
http://saturn.vcu.edu/~dmouer/homepage.htm
On Sat, 6 Feb 1999, Linda Derry wrote:
> I was just catching up on some reading and found a comment in Volume 21 of
> the CRM publication put out by the National Park Service about how the
> exhibit "Back of the Big House" generated so much criticism at the Library
> of Congress that it was hastily removed from display. I'm assuming this
> was the exhibit associated with one of my favorite publications "Back of the
> Big House, the Architecture of Plantation Slavery" by John Michael Vlach.
> Does any one out there know the specifics of the controversy and removal? I
> sure many of us work on plantation sites and could benefit from this news.
>
> Linda Derry ([log in to unmask])
> Old Cahawba Archaeological Park
> Alabama Historical Commission
>
|
|
|