BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
John Burgess <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 23 Jul 1999 19:59:34 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
John Burgess <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Ted Fischer wrote:

> Therefore I feel that it is opportune to try the neuroactive chemical
> coumaphos.  It will hit these Apistan-resistant mites at a different
> physiological site, hopefully controlling them before they can spread to
other
> colonies.  Then one can return to the safer Apistan.

I would simply suggest that a check to confirm that you really have
Apistan-resistant varroa before resorting to the much more hazardous
Coumaphos would be a good idea.

As far as I know, Apistan used according to the label has never left
detectable levels in honey. Is the same true for Coumaphos?

John Burgess, Editor Gwenynwyr Cymru/The Welsh Beekeeper
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2