BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Ted Fischer <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 16 Dec 1998 11:38:00 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
In response to Andy's comments about what is and is not allowed in
California - The authorities that be should be challenged to point out
just what has been "added" to cut comb honey.  Comb honey in all forms
is really the most basic, purest form of honey there is.  It is even in
its original container, as put there by the bee!  It is up the the
consumer to decide what to do with this container (the beeswax cell).
If he/she wants to eat the container, what should that matter to the
state of California?
 
Ted Fischer
Dexter, Michigan USA

ATOM RSS1 RSS2