BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Ken Hoare <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 26 Feb 1999 22:29:57 -0000
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Ruary states
 
>Use of the BBC /MAFF calculator shows that a NATURAL mite drop of 200 per<
>day in March is required before treatment would be needed in September. If<
>testing with Bayvarrol or Apistan is used the mite drop could well be some<
>360 times larger assuming a 90% efficiency.<
 
 
I believe he is failing to use the Conversion Chart at the rear of the
BBKA/MAFF calculator which states for the month of March;
 
Daily mite fall X 100 = Estimated number of mites in colony. (Rough
estimation)
 
So Natural Mite Mortality of 200 per day = 20,000 mites in the colony, a
severely infested colony probably past the point where any treatment will
prove useful, and way off the edge of the calculator which only rises to
5,000.
 
Ken Hoare

ATOM RSS1 RSS2