Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 12 Mar 2001 08:30:29 +1000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Yes but looking at the abstract of his paper in Landscapes it seems that
Rackham ignores much of recent geographic writings on the landscape.
There is also a paper in the Australian Journal of Historical Archaeology by
Sue Paerson Botanical indicators in Historical Archaeology, Australian
Historical Archaeology Vol 6 1988 pp74-82.
Iain Stuart
Principal, Archaeology and Heritage Management
HLA-Envirosciences Pty. Ltd.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Hicks [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 7:13 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Botany for archaeologists
Ben Ford <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I am interested in finding references regarding the use of plants as clues
> for site identification.
Take a look at Oliver Rackham's work - which has been central to the
development of historical ecology and the use of the botanical analysis to
identify evidence of past landscapes.
His various publications about Britain, and most recently Crete, include:
1976 Trees and Woodland in the British Landscape
1993 The History of the British Countryside
1996 The Making of the Cretan Landscape
You may also want to look at his recent paper in the excellent new journal
Landscapes. If you have difficulty getting hold of it, it's published by
Windgather Press, Macclesfield: www.windgather.co.uk
Rackham 2000. Prospects for Landscape History and Historical Ecology.
Landscapes 1(2)
Hope this helps,
Dan Hicks
www.fieldschool.net
|
|
|