just something that came up in relation to a lecture by a historian here in
dresden: just how much interplay is there between historians and archaeologists
elsewhere? as in: do the historians use our information or otherwise take us
seriously, or do they just sort of continue plodding along with their
documentary evidence r.e. founding of towns/cities/whatever, regardless of what
our evidence says to the contrary?

geoff carver
http://home.t-online.de/home/gcarver/
[log in to unmask]