BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
George Styer <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 15 Jan 1999 09:27:31 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
Adrian Wenner <[log in to unmask] wrote:
 
> And, no, I would not want the virgin
> queens from my colonies mating with drones that have cruised forth from
> many managed bee colonies some distance remote from this area.  Those
> drones would have come from colonies kept alive with the use of Apistan
> strips (a weak strain of bees, so to speak).
 
I don't see how you draw the inferred conclusion that a drone from a
treated colony is genetically weakened. Is it not possible that a colony
can have some genetic resistance to Varroa but just happened to be managed
by a beekeeper and therefore treated?
 
Just because I receive antibiotics after I have a surgery does not mean
that my offspring will be genetically weakened (challenged). My genetic
material remains the same.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2