HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Anthony P. Graesch" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 8 Jun 1998 12:53:18 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
Geoff-
        What aspect of soil description are you inquiring about?  Soil
color, composition, or consolidation?  Also, how is the "triangle" (which is
a classification scheme for soil composition) too abstract?
 
 
At 09:18 PM 6/8/98 +0200, you wrote:
>anyone have a simple and/or fool/idiot-proof system of soil descriptions which
>doesn't involve comparison to known samples? just asked a pedologist about the
>system out of Museum of London (handy flow-chart formula [which you can use in
>the field, which is really what i'm on about: the triangle is just too
>abstract], where you just have to roll balls or rolls or listen for scrunchy
>sand between your fingers) and he says it just don't make sense -
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Anthony P. Graesch
Doctoral Student
-------------------------
UCLA Department of Anthropology
405 Hilgard Avenue, Box 951553
Los Angeles,California
90095-1553; AJ53
-------------------------
E-mail: [log in to unmask]
(310)794-5871 (office)
(310)209-8348 (home)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2