HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"L. D Mouer" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 7 Feb 1999 11:25:28 -0500
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (31 lines)
Linda,
 
Bernie's version is what I remember hearing at the time. With a couple
small additions...it was (I was told by someone who should have known)
that the protesters were a very small number of employees and, in
addition, I do not think it was a public exhibit...it was a small exhibit
somewhere within the library available for viewing primarily by employees
and visiting researchers or something like that. Frankly, I am not
surprised that the book didn't create more of a stir.
 
Dan Mouer
Virginia Commonwealth University
[log in to unmask]
http://saturn.vcu.edu/~dmouer/homepage.htm
 
On Sat, 6 Feb 1999, Linda Derry wrote:
 
> I was just catching up on some reading and found a comment in  Volume 21 of
> the CRM publication put out by  the National Park Service about how the
> exhibit "Back of the Big House" generated so much criticism at the Library
> of Congress that it was hastily removed from display.   I'm assuming this
> was the exhibit associated with one of my favorite publications "Back of the
> Big House, the Architecture of Plantation Slavery" by John Michael Vlach.
> Does any one out there know the specifics of the controversy and removal?  I
> sure many of us work on plantation sites and could benefit from this news.
>
> Linda Derry ([log in to unmask])
> Old Cahawba Archaeological Park
> Alabama Historical Commission
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2