Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 16 Jan 2001 13:17:17 -0400 |
MIME-version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type=54455854;
x-mac-creator=4D4F5353 |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-transfer-encoding: |
7bit |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I don't know how successful your attempts to boost SIA membership were
at SHA. I suspect that the prominence given the SIA display, shoe
horned between a couple of other displays and in relative darkness, is
somewhat indicative of its relative significance. As I gave an
industrial archaeology presentation at SHA, I obviously think that
industrial archaeology is important and should play a greater role.
As an aside, how much overlap is there with nautical archaeology
organizations?
James Brothers
"Patrick E. Martin" wrote:
> Thanks, Ned and Bob, for positive feedback re: SIA. When I started
> working with the Society, I was shocked how little overlap there was
> between SIA and SHA; I calculated about 4% at that time. I started
> displaying SIA stuff at SHA meetings in '95, offering some incentives
> for new members from SHA, and the response, while not overwhelming,
> has been gratifying; we've hit 12% overlap. I think that there is
> still room for improvement, and I'll continue to proselytize. I
> expect to beat the drum at Long Beach, and interested parties can
> access our web page at http://www.ss.mtu.edu/IA/sia.html. By the
> way, SIA individual membership remains very reasonable at $35US! See
> you in California! Patrick Martin--
|
|
|