HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
David Babson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 18 Oct 1999 22:07:11 -0400
In-Reply-To:
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Back around 1993-95, USACERL was undertaking several
inventory/documentation surveys in the Canal Zone, though it escapes me if
they concerned the canal, or US DoD properties in the zone; I had nothing
to do with that one.  Anyone have any further information?



At 10:29 AM 10/18/99 -0400, you wrote:
>> George may ramble a bit in his postings, but he does have a point. What's
>> the status of the Section 106 effort at the Panama Canal? Under the new 36
>> CFR 800 revisions, the transfer of property has to be convenanted or it
>> will be an adverse effect.
>
>        John Dendy
>        Dynamac Corporation
>        Fort Riley, KS
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2