HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 15 Sep 1998 14:30:38 MDT
Reply-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Subject:
From:
LOCKHART BILL <[log in to unmask]>
Content-transfer-encoding:
7BIT
In-Reply-To:
<v01540b00b222f0995737@[209.86.160.92]>
Organization:
Alamogordo Branch Community College
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
Paul,
 
        I don't know how much help this will be, but the manufacturer's mark
on the base is probably from the Armstrong Cork Co., Glass Division,
Lancaster, PA, used from 1938-1969 (Toulouse 24-25).  The mark was
used earlier by American Glass Works, Richmond, VA, and Paden City,
WV, 1908-1935 (Toulouse 23-23).
 
Toulouse, Bottle Makers and Their Marks, 1971, Thomas Nelson, New
York.
 
        The "Federal Law Prohibits. . ." warning did not begin until the end
of Prohibition, so the bottle was probably made by Armstrong.  *Most*
glass houses were embossing the year that bottles were made (at least
beverage bottles--sodas, milks, beer, liquor) by the early 1940s.
That makes the 48 a likely candidate for the year the bottle was
manufactured (1948).
 
        Hope this may be of some small help.
 
        Some of us are trying to put together a glass group to answer
questions such as this.  Are you interested?
 
Bill Lockhart
[log in to unmask]
(505) 439-3732

ATOM RSS1 RSS2