HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Carl Steen <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 24 Feb 1998 18:56:50 EST
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (7 lines)
Roberta--I would check Noel Hume first--he explains it clearly, but there are
plenty of other sources (Lyle Stone's Fort Michilimackinac report, for
instance). Roenke and Chance and Chance have developed regression formula
based dating methods (like pipe stem dating) which appear to be useful on 19th
century glass, but the authors argue that they are only sure that they work in
their particular study area. Carl Steen

ATOM RSS1 RSS2