BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: - Honey adulteration
From:
T & M Weatherhead <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 20 Dec 1998 08:47:18 PST
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; X-MAPIextension=".TXT"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (9 lines) 
Allen wrote that the information passed on to him indicated that this Honey analog could detected.
 
I have been checking in Australia and the initial information seems that we are confident that our analytical methods will pick it up.  One person in Australia has seen what he asumed was this product in honey on sale in Singapore and said that just looking at it he was able to pick that it was not pure honey.
 
So it seems not all doom and gloom but it was timely wake up call.
 
Trevor Weatherhead
AUSTRALIA

ATOM RSS1 RSS2