BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Bill Truesdell <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 9 Sep 1998 08:55:03 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
I doubt if we will ever know for sure, but the bee kills may have been because of
HFCS or misuse of mitacure. Could also have been the mitacure, but not from what I
have heard to date. In any case, the manufacturer pulled it because it was not
worth the law suits along with the small beekeeping market.
Bill T
 
Andy Nachbaur wrote:
 
>  Miticur,
> was pulled by the formulator because of bee kill problems not food residue
> problems as it never was in use long enough or used on enough hives to have
> that problem.(w)OPINIONS are not necessarily facts. USE  AT OWN RISK!
 
--
If there is a zz before clinic.net, remove it to reply directly.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2