HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
geoff carver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 12 Jun 1998 20:53:29 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
Marley Brown schrieb:
>   I
> don't read anywhere that Edward Harris is suggesting that all
> archaeological sites are visibly stratified or that prehistorians are
> necessarily bad diggers by virtue of employing arbitrary levels.
> To learn that Harris is "dead wrong" thus comes as somewhat of a
> surprise.  Is this what such forums are all about- putting words in
> other peoples' mouths so that others may take offense?  I don't find
> such exchanges very productive.
>
 
harris does in fact say that he recognizes that there are sites without
stratigraphy - think he says something specifically about "bronze age or
earlier" - not sure of what page or anything, but it is in there -
 
 
geoff carver
[log in to unmask]
http://home.t-online.de/home/gcarver/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2