HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Jim Gibb <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 17 Oct 1997 21:12:59 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Paul,
The State of Maryland can extend the same protection over cultural resources on
private
lands that it currently exercises on state lands, provided of course the propert
y owner
requests such protection and agrees to certain stipulations. For further informa
tion you
should contact Rodney J. Little, State Historic Preservation Officer, Maryland
Historical Trust, 100 Community Place, Crownsville, Maryland USA 21032-2023; Tel
.
410.514.7600. They have a Web site, but I don't know the URL off hand.
Jim Gibb
The Lost Towns of Anne Arundel Project
Annapolis, MD  USA
Paul Courtney wrote:
>
> Can anyone tell me of any US states (not local districts) which apply
> planning protection such as in Section 106 to private as well as federal and
> state owned lands. An article I read implied that a very few states in the
> USA did but gave no details. The reason for the request is that I am trying
> to write some course material on comparative cultural resource management.
> Paul Courtney, Leicester, UK

ATOM RSS1 RSS2