BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Is a queen that starts to lay 20 days after emerging a bad queen?
From:
Jon <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 13 Jul 1998 09:00:16 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (9 lines) 
I frequently have read that a queen that starts to lay later than 15 days
after emerging is a bad queen, is that true?.
I have verified a lot of times that queens which started to lay 30 days
after emerging were so good or better than 15 day's queens. So, what is true
and false in this matter?.
 
Thanks in advance.
Jon

ATOM RSS1 RSS2