Sender: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 18 Feb 1998 17:12:29 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
Organization: |
Praxis |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Carlos,
Thanks for being kind! I don't know if we gringos diserve it. I think we are
probably as indulgent of bureaucratic ineptitudes as any body else.
Pat
Carlos Aparicio wrote:
> It is widely supposed Latin America is the paradise of Burocracy and
> this fact is an important cause of its misfortunes.
>
> America (North)seems competing hard in this field.
>
> Is hardly believable a oil edible for babies is forbbiden for bees
> for the only reason is dangerous for varroas health (their desvastating
> parasit).
>
> Carlos Aparicio
>
> At 07:44 PM 15/02/1998 -0800, Bill Truesdell wrote:
> >Patrick,
> >I agree, we should be talking registration. As far as oil needing it, I just
> >checked my dormant oil spray that is used for red spider mites on trees, and
> >it has EPA registration. And it is only oil, (and may be only mineral oil!)
> >but is used as a pesticide so appears to need registration.
> >Bill Truesdell
> >Bath, ME
> >
> >Patrick McKown wrote:
> >
> >> Folks,
> >>
> >> Been seeing a lot of mention of EPA 'approval'. Do you have
> >> documentation that says the EPA approves. Would like your source. Far as
> >> I was aware they only regististered or registered toxic substances. The
> >> costs reflecting mostly testing for wether they should be registered as
> >> 'general' or 'restricted'. What is the wisdom on getting a registration
> >> for MO? I am not following this?
> >>
> >> Pat McKown
> >
> >
|
|
|