HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8BIT
Sender:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
geoff carver <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 12 Feb 1998 21:11:50 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
interesting discussion there about the state registries; now: HOW EFFECTIVE ARE
THEY? do they do their job or does a lot of shit still get swept up under the
carpets (aka a glossy excavation report)? do the powers that be consider
them/the system effective? do the excavators themselves? would anyone recommend
such a system/such systems be set up elsewhere, or have ideas about how they
might be improved upon?
 
comments, pro and contra, off-list if you want:
[log in to unmask]
        or
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2