Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 5 Jan 1998 08:29:47 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Anita,
You might contact Carl Kutruff about Fort Loudon in Tennessee. It was
reconstructed on a thick pad of fill when the actual site was to be
inudated by a dam project. It is now a state park.
As Cathy Spude notes in a message she circulated on your behalf on NPS
bulletin board, National Park Service cultural resources policy does
not ordinarily allow reconstruction, but it can be done under certain
circumstances. Usually that means good evidence of the above ground
appearance of a structure (e.g., photographs) and placement on the
original site. Anything reconstructed at another location would be
considered an "exhibit," and those are discouraged.
No off-site reconstructions in national parks come to mind, but I will
check.
Vergil
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Reconstructed Buildings
Author: Anita Cohen-Williams <[log in to unmask]> at NP--INTERNET
Date: 1/1/98 4:24 PM
Can anyone give me examples (or sources to check) of reconstructed
buildings that were not built on their original site, or moved a few feet
off of their original footprint? I am especially interested in buildings in
state or national parks. Thanks!
Anita Cohen-Williams
Listowner of HISTARCH, SUB-ARCH, SPANBORD
Co-listowner/Manager of ANTHRO-L
Contributing Editor, Anthropology
http://www.suite101.com
|
|
|