> Actually, I think Dave is correct when he states that the connection
> between honey and botulism is anecdotal.  I think when the original
> investigation of the case in which honey was identified as the cause of
> botulism (I believe it was in California), honey was identified as a
> 'possible' source.  However as Dave pointed out in his post, 'possible'
> sources are everywhere.
 
You can get a short annotated bibliography on the subject of honey
and infant botulism by sending a message to
 
[log in to unmask]
 
 
 
Nick Wallingford
[log in to unmask]
Tauranga, NZ
http://www.beekeeping.co.nz