HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-To:
Linda Derry <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 12 Jun 1998 12:58:39 -0400
Reply-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Jake Ivey <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
     The "metric" approach to archaeology is still a standard method in a
     fair percentage of the fieldwork in Texas, New Mexico, and Arizona,
     although there are a few who attempt to dig by strats or by a hybrid
     system of strats and metric levels.  10 cm is the standard, but larger
     intervals are used "where there's no stratigraphy."  Part of the
     problem is that much of southwestern fieldwork is considered
     "testing," and utilizes 1m x 1m units, or at best 2m x 2m units.  Even
     large area excavations might be set up as a series of small "test"
     units.
 
     Jake.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2