HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Carl Steen <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 8 Feb 1997 08:37:58 -0500
Reply-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
In a message dated 97-02-07 19:00:51 EST, you write:
 
<<
 The challange would be in the development of comparitive theory and
 methodology.  As someone in an earlier post said Mark Leone might not be the
 only theorist in histoircal archaeology but it seems that his and Deetz's
work
 is at least looking at an international change rather than a local change.
  >>
 
 
One might argue that the work of Stan South and Ken Lewis have addressed this
all along.
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                         Carl
Steen

ATOM RSS1 RSS2