HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Date:
Mon, 8 Jun 1998 21:18:16 +0200
Reply-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8BIT
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
From:
geoff carver <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
anyone have a simple and/or fool/idiot-proof system of soil descriptions which
doesn't involve comparison to known samples? just asked a pedologist about the
system out of Museum of London (handy flow-chart formula [which you can use in
the field, which is really what i'm on about: the triangle is just too
abstract], where you just have to roll balls or rolls or listen for scrunchy
sand between your fingers) and he says it just don't make sense -
 
lazy bastard finally set up a website:
http://home.t-online.de/home/gcarver
geoff carver
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2