BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"K. Bokhorst" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 18 Feb 1998 22:01:05 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
----------
From: Robert A. Roach <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: EPA/FDA Contacts
Date: Sunday, February 15, 1998 7:53 PM
 
Bruce,
 
The pesticide approval process is daunting but that is not to say that MO
registration is unfeasible.  I recently worked with some people who wanted
to get Quassia, a botanical insecticide, registered.  The EPA wants to
register reduced-risk pesticides.  They were supportive and tried to help.
They waived a lot of studies but the costs were still expected to exceed
$50,000.
 
FGMO has the advantage of being accepted for use in food.  This means it
should qualify for an exemption from having a tolerance established in
honey or wax.
 
FGMO is not accepted for use IN food. It is accepted that it is used in
products that may come in contact with food.
-------------------------
Karel Bokhorst

ATOM RSS1 RSS2