Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 8 Nov 1998 07:24:53 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Education is, or should be, a major function of any public activity. Public
agencies, in theory, should always have an education function or at least a
public relations function.
There is a major obstacle, however. That obstacle is bad press.
Bureaucrats too often are absolutely petrified at the idea of criticism
(not necessarily actual criticism, but the idea of criticism). I have
worked for such spineless wimps,who have inevitably gotten their just
desserts.
The bureaucratic instinct is to run for cover and maintain the lowest
possible profile. As a result, public agencies doing archaeology frequently
fail to communicate effectively with the public.
Any public exposure will attract some criticism, and a few nutsies. In my
experience, too many bureaucrats are terrified at the idea of receiving any
criticism.
A public education program, as Bob Schuyler discusses, can help an agency
or a project immensely. Unfortunately, any public outreach will attract a
few opposition zealots who will be satisfied with nothing less than the
governor's head on a platter. Fear of such adverse reaction can result in a
complete shutdown of any outreach.
Selling archaeological education and outreach will too frequently be a
selling job against the very root instincts by which bureaucrats maintain
their existence.
___(_____) When does a good archaeologist become an
|Baby the\ incompetent archaeologist?
|1969 Land\_===__
___Rover ___|o
|_/ . \______/ . || Answer: Just after he leaves the room.
__\_/________\_/________________________________________________
Ned Heite, Camden, DE http://home.dmv.com/~eheite/index.html
|
|
|