Don't you hate when people try to be snotty. Everyone involved in the
discussion knows that wire nails where not present on Civil War sites.
That was the point. Now as for your rude "IT IS WRONG" would not it be
better if you said I have conducted significant research on wire nails
and have the following article that would be helpful. I hope this little
message will help petty small minded people to remember to be nice.
John Cornelison
Personal opinion
-----Original Message-----
From: William H. Adams [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 1998 3:02 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: wire nails
Just because something has a known invention date of 1850,
doesn't mean it was made in sufficient quantity to get into the
archaeological record that year, decade, or even century. Historical
archaeologists use technology dates, when they should be looking at
discard dates (and cross-culturally). Research is showing that
mass-produced items from the 1850s won't show up on archaeological sites
until the 1870s or 1880s.
Now, as to the 1850s wire nail date. IT IS WRONG. Read below if
you are interested......
The following is from my manuscript:
Machine Cut Nails and Wire Nails: American Production and Use
for Dating 19th Century Sites
WILLIAM HAMPTON ADAMS
The rise of wire nails was dependent upon the broader technology
of wire production. Once wire was made in quantity, then wire nails
would become a common spin-off industry. The invention of barbed wire in
1873 and the production of wire nails ³probably accounted for the
rapidity of the rise of wire² itself (Temin 1964:227). ³Wire had been
made before steel became a mass-produced article, but the quantities had
been small² up to 1890 (Temin 1964:226). So, while the development of a
wire industry had to precede the mass production of the wire nail, in
the end the wire nail<and barbed wire<stimulated further usages of wire.
Although mass-production would not happen until later in the
19th century, limited production actually began a half century earlier
than most archaeologists think, based upon the usual literature. Patents
for wire nails were first issued in France in 1806 (Fremont
1912:366-67). Wire nails were first produced in France in 1819 according
to Fremont (1912:366), much earlier than the early 1850s usually
ascribed in the archaeological literature (Fontana and Greenleaf 1962;
Nelson 1968:9-10). One wire nail machine shown at the Paris Exhibition
of 1844 and illustrated by Laboulaye (1845:Figure 549) consisted ³of a
relatively sophisticated hand-cranked apparatus which cut, headed and
pointed a nail from a coil of wire by a turn of the crank² (Priess
1973:88). Thus, one might expect that in French-settled portions of
America, like Louisiana and Quebec, wire nails may be found in small
quantities from 1819 onward. British patents for wire nails began in the
1850s (Priess and Shaugnessy 1972:17). The first production of wire
nails in North America has had several claimants and these range from
1851-1875 (for details, see Priess 1973:88). In any case, wire nails in
North America were not produced in significant quantities until the mid
1880s. The earliest American made wire nails were not used in building
construction, being limited to use in making small items like cigar
boxes and for packing crates made from soft woods (Priess 1973:88).
³American wire nail machinery was not really perfected until the 1860s
and 70s² (Nelson 1968:10). The first American patent appeared in 1877
(Priess and Shaugnessy 1972:54).
³Wire nails were replacing cut nails for two reasons, their
different shape and their dif-ferent material. Steel was of increasing
qual-ity and cheapness; the price of steel nail plate probably fell
below that of wrought-iron plate soon after the price of steel rails
passed that of iron rails. And the round wire nails were found to be
better than the square ones in addition, after some inventions in the
1880s, to being easier to make. They were widely criticized for their
lack of holding power, but this was offset by their greater ability to
penetrate wood without splitting it. They also weighed less than cut
nails of equivalent length, which meant a larger number of nails in a
pound and consequent lower freight charges. For these reasons, the
production of cut nails reached a peak in 1886 and fell thereafter, and
the production of wire rods for wire nails rose² (Temin 1964:227).
Based on information provided by the American Wire Nail Company,
James M. Swank (1892:450-51) stated:
³Very great difficulty was experienced in in-ducing the hardware
trade to recognize the wire brad and wire nail as a salable com-modity.
From 1878 to 1880 the growth of the wire nail was very slow and was
attend-ed with many difficulties. Deep rooted prej-udices of all kinds
had to be overcome. It was not until the year 1883 or 1884 that the wire
nail came into the market promi-nently as a competitor of the cut nail.²
³As the wire nail began to make inroads on the cut nail in the
1880¹s, manufacturers of cut nails took steps to regain as much of the
lost trade as possible. S They were able to demonstrate to their
satisfaction that the cut nail was far superior. It had, they said, 75%
to 100% greater holding power than the wire nail² (Hogan 1971:190). ³The
nail manufacturing technique moved first from the iron cut nail to the
steel cut nail and then to the steel wire nail. This change took place
within the twenty year period from 1880 to 1900. At the beginning of
this period both the steel cut nail and the wire nail were not produced
in commercial quantities since both were introduced in 1882 or 1883²
(Hogan 1971:188). The change to steel has been blamed on an 1885 iron
puddler¹s strike in the Wheeling district but this strike probably only
hastened slightly the inevitable transition (Hogan 1971:189). No figures
exist for the 1882 to 1885 period of wire production, while the
1886-1890 figures are estimated, because the naileries were so secretive
(Hogan 1971:189). ³The wire nail first appeared in considerable
quantities in 1884² (Wright 1907:178). The market for wire nails rose
rapidly thereafter. In 1884, one supply company in Portland, Oregon,
listed only wire nails (Thompson, DeHart and Company 1884).
From the above discussion, we can draw the following conclusions
regarding wire nails. Although patents were issued for wire nails as
early as 1806, but were probably not in production until 1819. Wire
nails could be present on a site in very small numbers after 1819 as
part of shipping boxes and furniture, especially if these originated in
France. Larger sizes (for architectural construction) would not be
present until the 1850s (and probably much later). From ca. 1851-1883
wire nails may begin to accumulate in sites in small numbers, but were
probably not used in building structures simply because so few were
produced. Structures built before 1883 were built entirely, or almost
entirely, of machine cut nails. On the other hand, structures built
after about 1897 were most likely built using wire nails. Because the
two major sources usually cited (Fontana and Greenleaf 1962; Nelson
1968:9-10) gave the 1850s as the start of wire nail production and the
1890s as the major transition to wire nails, many archaeologists assume
that a site with both kinds of nails dates from the 1851-1890s period,
especially if the two kinds are about evenly frequent (e.g., Orser,
Nekola, and Roark 1987:558). What we must understand is that just
because patents exist for a technology or a technology is known to date
from a certain point onward, does not mean that those dates can be used
for dating a site directly. Based on the available manufacturing data,
very few buildings in the United States could have been built using wire
nails prior to about 1883. In the United States, virtually all
construction of frame buildings after about 1900 used wire nails almost
exclusively. Because British naileries switched to wire nails in the
1860s and 1870s, well ahead of the American brethren, we would expect
that British supplied colonies and former colonies, like Australia, New
Zealand, and Canada, would have earlier access to wire nails than in
America. Import records in those places should establish the nail
sources before trying to use wire nails for dating during this
transitional period.
REFERENCES
ADAMS, WILLIAM HAMPTON
n.d. a Time Lag of Historic Artifacts. Ms.
n.d. b Source Analysis for American Importation of
Nails, 1790-1819. Ms.
ADAMS, WILLIAM HAMPTON (EDITOR)
1980 Waverly Plantation: Ethnoarchaeology of a Tenant
Farming Community. Na-tional Technical Information Service, Washington,
D.C.
ADAMS, WILLIAM H. AND LINDA P. GAW
1977 A Model for Determining Time Lag of Ceramic
Artifacts. Northwest Anthropo-logical Research Notes 11(2):218-231.
ADAMS, WILLIAM H., LINDA P. GAW, AND FRANK C. LEONHARDY
1975 Archaeological Excavations at Silcott,
Washington: The Data Inventory. Re-ports of Investigations 53.
Laboratory of Anthropology, Washington State Uni-versity, Pullman.
ADAMS, WILLIAM HAMPTON, STEVEN D. SMITH, DAVID F. BARTON,
TIMOTHY B. RIORDAN, AND STEPHEN POYSER
1981 Bay Springs Mill: Historical Archaeolo-gy of a
Rural Mississippi Cotton Milling Community. National Technical
Information Service, Washington, D.C.
AMERICAN METAL MARKET
1918 Metal Statistics 1918. American Metal Market
Company, New York.
AMERICAN STATE PAPERS
1832a Documents, Legislative and Executive of the
Congress of the United States. from the First Session of the First
Congress to the Third Session of the Thirteenth Congress, Commencing
March 3, 1789 and Ending March 3, 1815. Volume 5. Finance. Volume 1.
Gates & Seaton, Washington, D.C.
1832b Documents, Legislative and Executive of the
Congress of the United States. from the First Session of the First
Congress to the Third Session of the Thirteenth Congress, Commencing
March 3, 1789 and Ending March 3, 1815. Volume 6. Finance. Volume 2.
Gates & Seaton, Washington, D.C.
1834a Documents, Legislative and Executive of the
Congress of the United States. from the First Session of the Fourteenth
Congress to the Second Session of the Seventeenth Congress, inclusive:
Commencing March 3, 1815, and Ending March 3, 1823. Commerce and
Navigation Volume 2. Gates & Seaton, Washington, D.C.
1834b Documents, Legislative and Executive of the
Congress of the United States. from the First Session of the Fourteenth
Congress to the First Session of the Seventeenth Congress, inclusive:
Commencing December ¢, 1815, and Ending May 8, 1822. Finance. Volume 3.
Gates & Seaton, Washington, D.C.
1858 Documents, Legislative and Executive of the
Congress of the United States. from the Second Session of the
Seventeenth Congress to the First Session of the Eighteenth Congress,
Commencing December 3, 1822 and Ending March 22, 1824. Class III. On
Finance. Volume 4. Gates & Seaton, Washington, D.C.
1859 Documents, Legislative and Executive of the
Congress of the United States. from the First Session of the Eighteenth
Congress to the First Session of the Twentieth Congress, Commencing
April 19, 1824 and Ending May 16, 1828. Class III. On Finance. Volume 5.
Gates & Seaton, Washington, D.C.
BARTOVICS, ALBERT F.
1981 The Archaeology of Daniel¹s Village: An
Experiment in Settlement Archaeol-ogy. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation,
Department of Anthropology, Brown University, Providence.
BLEE, CATHERINE HOLDER
1983 Archaeological Investigations in Skag-way,
Alaska, Volume 1. The White Pass and Yukon Route Broadway Depot and
General Offices Buildings, Klondike Gold Rush National Historic Park.
U.S. Govern-ment Printing Office, Denver.
1988 Archaeological Investigations in Skag-way,
Alaska, Volume 2. The Moore Cabin and House, Klondike Gold Rush National
Historic Park. U.S. Govern-ment Printing Office, Denver.
CARLEY, CAROLINE D., AND ROBERT LEE SAPPINGTON
1984 Archaeological Test Excavation of the Historic
Component of 45-WT-1, Texas City/Riparia, Whitman County, Washington,
1983. University of Idaho, Anthropological Research Manuscript Series
77.
CARLSON, GAYLE F.
1979 Archeological Investigations at Fort Atkinson
(25WN9), Washington County Nebraska, 1956-1971. Nebraska State
Historical Society, Publications in An-thropology 8, Lincoln.
CENSUS OF MANUFACTURES
1860 Census of Manufactures U.S. Bureau of the
Census, Washington, D.C.
1914 Census of Manufactures U.S. Bureau of the
Census, Washington, D.C.
1923 Census of Manufactures U.S. Bureau of the
Census, Washington, D.C.
1931 Census of Manufactures U.S. Bureau of the
Census, Washington, D.C.
CHANCE, DAVID H., AND JENNIFER V. CHANCE
1985 Archaeology at Spalding, 1978 & 1979. University
of Idaho, Anthropological Research Manuscript Series 85.
CROUCH, DAVID J.
1978 Archaeological Investigations of the Kiowa and
Comanche Indian Agency Commissaries, 34CM232. Contribu-tions of the
Museum of the Great Plains 7. Lawton, Oklahoma.
FONTANA, BERNARD L. AND J. CAMERON GREENLEAF
1962 Johnny Ward¹s Ranch: A Study in His-toric
Archaeology. The Kiva 28(1-2):1-115.
FREMONT, CHARLES
1912 Le clou. Société pour l'Encouragement de
l'Industrie Nationale, Bulletin 111:193-221, 36-97, 522-48, 672-700,
808-28.
GILLIO, DAVID, FRANCES LEVINE, AND DOUGLAS SCOTT
1980 Some Common Artifacts Found at His-torical
Sites. Cultural Resource Report 31. USDA, Forest Service, Southwest-ern
Region, Albuquerque.
GRABERT, GARLAND
1968 The Astor Fort Okanogan. Department of
Anthropology, University of Washington, Reports in Archaeology 2.
GRANGER, JOSEPH E. AND DONALD B. BALL
1982 Historic Archaeological Investigations of the
Linville Site, 15BK12, Bracken County, Kentucky. Granger Associ-ates,
Louisville. Report on file, Office of State Archaeologist, Lexington,
Kentucky.
HERSKOVITZ, ROBERT M.
1978 Fort Bowie Material Culture. Anthropo-logical
Papers of the University of Ari-zona 31. Tucson.
HOFFMAN, J.J. AND LESTER A. ROSS
1973 Fort Vancouver Excavations (Vol. 4). Chief
Factor¹s House and Kitchen. Na-tional Park Service, Fort Vancouver
Na-tional Historic Site.
1974a Fort Vancouver Excavations (Vol. 6). Sales Shop.
National Park Service, Fort Vancouver National Historic Site.
1974b Fort Vancouver Excavations (Vol. 8). Fur Store.
National Park Service, Fort Vancouver National Historic Site.
1975 Fort Vancouver Excavations (Vol. 8). Indian
Trade Store. National Park Ser-vice, Fort Vancouver National Historic
Site.
HOGAN, WILLIAM T.
1971 Economic History of the Iron and Steel Industry
in the United States (Vol. I). D.C. Heath, Lexington, Mas-sachusetts
JURNEY, DAVID H.
1987 Cut and Wire Nails: Functional and Temporal
Interpretations. In Historic build-ings, material culture, and people of
the prairie margin: architecture, artifacts, and synthesis of historic
archæology, edited by David H. Jurney and Randall W. Moir, pp. 83-96.
Richland Creek Technical Series 5. Archaeology Re-search Program,
Southern Methodist University, Dallas.
LABOULAYE, CHARLES (EDITOR)
1845 Dictionaire des Arts et Manufactures:
Descriptions des Procédés de l'Industrie Française et Etrangere.
Librarie Poly-technique, Brussels.
LOVEJOY, AMOS J., JR.
1983 The Rise and Decline of the American Cut Nail
Industry. Greenwood Press, Westport, CT.
MOIR, RANDALL W.
1987 Socioeconomic and Chronometric Pat-terning of
Window Glass. In Historic build-ings, material culture, and people of
the prairie margin: architecture, artifacts, and synthesis of historic
archæology, edited by David H. Jurney and Randall W. Moir, pp. 73-81.
Richland Creek Technical Series 5. Archaeology Re-search Program,
Southern Methodist University, Dallas.
MUSITELLI, MARIANNE
1986 Artifact Description. Wine, Yaman and Stone: The
Archaeology of a Russian Hospital Trash Pit, Sitka National Historic
Park, Sitka, Alaska, by Catherine H. Blee, pp. 221-26. U.S. Government
Printing Office, Denver.
NELSON, LEE H.
1968 Nail Chronology as an Aid to Dating Old
Buildings. American Association for State and Local History, Technical
Leaflet 48.
NOBLE, WILLIAM C.
1973 The Excavation and Historical Identifica-tion of
Rocky Mountain House. Parks Canada, Canadian Historic Sites 6. Ottawa.
ORSER, CHARLES E., JR., ANNETTE M. NEKOLA, JAMES L. ROARK
1987 Exploring the Rustic Life: Multidisci-plinary
Research at Millwood Planta-tion, a Large Piedmont Plantation in
Abbeville County, South Carolina and Elbert County, Georgia. National
Park Service, Atlanta.
PHILLIPS, MAUREEN K.
1994 ³Mechanic Geniuses and Duckies,² A Revision of
New England¹s Cut Nail Chronology Before 1920. APT Bulletin
25(3/4):4-16.
PRIESS, PETER J.
1972 Building Hardware from the Fort at Coteau du
Lac. National Historic Sites Service, Manuscript Report 93.
1973 Wire Nails in North America. Associa-tion for
Preservation Technology 5(4):87-92.
1974 Wire Nails in North America. Society for
Historical Archaeology Newsletter 7(1):22-28.
1978 An Annotated Bibliography for the Study of
Building Hardware. Parks Canada, Canadian Historic Sites 21. Ot-tawa.
PRIESS, PETER J. AND P. MICHAEL SHAUGNESSY
1972 An Inventory of Canadian, British, and American
Nail Patents to 1900. Parks Canada, Manuscript Report 93.
RHODES, DIANE LEE
1987 Archaeological Investigations in Skagway,
Alaska. Volume 3, The Mill Creek Dump and the Peniel Mission. National
Park Service, Denver.
RIORDAN, TIMOTHY B.
1985 The Relative Economic Status of Black and White
Regiments in the Pre-World War I Army: An Example from Fort Walla Walla,
Washington. Ph.D. disser-tation, Department of Anthropol-ogy, Washington
State Uni-versity, Pullman. University Micro-films, Ann Arbor.
RIORDAN, TIMOTHY B. AND WILLIAM H. ADAMS
1980 Dating the Archaeological Sites. In Wa-verly
Plantation: Ethnoar-chaeology of a Ten-ant Farming Com-munity, edited by
William H. Adams, pp. 587-93. National Technical Informa-tion Service,
Washing-ton, D.C.
ROENKE, KARL G.
1978 Flat Glass: Its Use as a Dating Tool for
Nineteenth Century Archaeological Sites in the Pacific Northwest and
Elsewhere. Northwest Anthropological Research Notes, Memoir 4.
ROSS, LESTER A.
1976 Fort Vancouver 1829-1860: A Historical
Archaeological Investigation of the Goods Imported and Manufactured by
the Hudson¹s Bay Company. National Park Service, Fort Vancouver National
His-toric Site.
ROSS, LESTER A., BRYN H. THOMAS, CHARLES H. HIBBS, CAROLINE D.
CARLEY
1975 Fort Vancouver Excavations (Vol. 10).
Southeastern Fort Area. National Park Service, Fort Vancouver National
His-toric Site.
ROTHMAN, MARGARET L.
1980 Flat Glass. Waverly Plantation:
Ethnoar-chaeology of a Tenant Farm-ing Com-munity, edited by William H.
Adams, pp. 491-95. National Techni-cal Information Service, Washington,
D.C.
ROTHMAN, MARGARET L. AND KAREN JO WALKER
1981 The Nail Typology. In Bay Springs Mill:
Historical Archaeology of a Rural Mis-sissippi Cotton Milling Community,
by William Hampton Adams, Steven D. Smith, David F. Barton, Timothy B.
Riordan, and Stephen Poyser, pp. 346-60. National Technical Information
Ser-vice, Washington, D.C.
SAASTAMA, SUSAN
1971 The Application of a Functional Typology in the
Analysis of Artifacts from the Excavation of Old Fort Colvile, Spring
1970. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of
Idaho, Moscow.
SALWEN, BERT AND SARAH T. BRIDGES
1977 Cultural Differences and the Interpreta-tion of
Archaeological Evidence: Prob-lems With Dates. Researches and
Trans-actions of the New York State Archaeological Association
17(1):165-173.
SANDERS, JUDITH A., MARY K. WEBER, AND DAVID R. BRAUNER
1983 Willamette Mission Archaeological Pro-ject.
Anthropology Northwest 1. Oregon State University, Corvallis.
SCHUYLER, ROBERT L. AND ______ MILLS
SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY
1825 Letter from the Secretary of the Treasury
Transmitting Statements of the Commerce and Navigation of the United
States During the Year Ending on the 30th September, 1824. Serial 117.
Gales and Seaton, Washington.
SMITH, STEVEN D., DAVID F. BARTON, AND TIMOTHY B. RIORDAN
1982 Ethnoarchæology of the Bay Springs Farmsteads: A
Study of Rural Ameri-can Settlement. National Technical In-formation
Service, Washington.
SPEULDA, LOU ANN
1988 Champoeg: A Frontier Community in Oregon,
1830-1861. Anthropology Northwest 3. Oregon State University, Corvallis.
SPRAGUE, RODERICK, EDITOR
1983 San Juan Archaeology. Laboratory of
Anthropology, University of Idaho, Moscow.
STAPP, AND LONGENECKER
1983
University of Idaho, Anthropological Research Manuscript Series
__.
SWANK, JAMES M.
1892 History of the Manufacture of Iron and
Particularly in the United States from Colonial Times to 1891. Burt
Franklin, New York.
STEELE, HARVEY W., LESTER A. ROSS, AND CHARLES H. HIBBS
1975 Fort Vancouver Excavations (Vol. 12). OAS Sale
Shop Excavation. Oregon Ar-chaeological Society and National Park
Service. Fort Vancouver National Historic Site.
TEAGUE, GEORGE AND LYNETTE O. SHENK
1977 Excavations at Harmony Borax Works: Historical
Archaeology at Death Valley National Monument. National Park Service,
Western Archaeological Center Publications 6. Tucson.
TEMIN, PETER
1964 Iron and Steel in Nineteenth Century America.
MIT Press, Cambridge.
U.S. CENSUS BUREAU
1970 Historical Statistics of the United States. U.S.
Government Printing Office, Washington.
VINTON, MAJOR D. H.
1976 Estimate of Quartermaster¹s Stores Required for
the Service of the Pacific Division, United States Army, for the Year
Commencing July 1, 1850. Kanaka Village/Vancouver Barracks 1974, edited
by David H. Chance and Jennifer V. Chance, pp. 303-306. Office of
Public Archaeology, University of Washington, Seattle.
WALKER, JOHN W.
1971 Excavation of the Arkansas Post Branch of the
Bank of the State of Arkansas, Arkansas Post National Memorial,
Arkansas. Southeast Archaeological Center, National Park Service.
WALKER, KAREN JO
1980 Fasteners. Waverly Plantation: Ethnoar-chaeology
of a Tenant Farm-ing Com-munity, edited by William H. Adams, pp. 543-52.
National Techni-cal Information Service, Washington, D.C.
WRIGHT, CARROLL D.
1907 The Industrial Revolution of the United States.
Charles Scribner¹s Sons, New York.
William Hampton Adams
Department of Archaeology
School of Cultural Studies
Flinders University
GPO Box 2100 Adelaide SA 5001
Australia
Phone Work: (08) 82013167
E-mail: [log in to unmask]
http://adminwww.cc.flinders.edu.au/Archaeology/Home
|
