HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ned Heite <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 6 Feb 1997 06:41:21 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
David Rotenstein is correct in his statement that a slaughterhouse will
have a signature similar to a farmyard, because the activities are similar.
A farmyard typically contains a slaughtering activity area, after all.
Apropos David's remarks on sanitation, I'll believe it when I see it. Blood
and offal will be removed, it is true, but if the slaughterhouse has a wood
floor or a dirt floor, you can bet that there will be a chemical footprint
for the slaughterhouse and its disposal areas. So I'd look for a big blob
of the elements that betray animal waste.
 
Phosphates are, indeed, the universal signature element.  Sorry, I misspoke.
 
Chemical surveys have some drawbacks, such as the modifying effect of pH. I
have been working potash lately, and mis-emphasized it. Sorry. We used
potassium to pinpoint a house site recently, with astonishing results.
 
 
 
Ned Heite
Camden, Delaware 19934
Icelandic wool catalogue:  http://www.dmv.com/~iceland
See our draft articles on: http://home.dmv.com/~eheite/index.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2