Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 6 Feb 1997 06:41:21 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
David Rotenstein is correct in his statement that a slaughterhouse will
have a signature similar to a farmyard, because the activities are similar.
A farmyard typically contains a slaughtering activity area, after all.
Apropos David's remarks on sanitation, I'll believe it when I see it. Blood
and offal will be removed, it is true, but if the slaughterhouse has a wood
floor or a dirt floor, you can bet that there will be a chemical footprint
for the slaughterhouse and its disposal areas. So I'd look for a big blob
of the elements that betray animal waste.
Phosphates are, indeed, the universal signature element. Sorry, I misspoke.
Chemical surveys have some drawbacks, such as the modifying effect of pH. I
have been working potash lately, and mis-emphasized it. Sorry. We used
potassium to pinpoint a house site recently, with astonishing results.
Ned Heite
Camden, Delaware 19934
Icelandic wool catalogue: http://www.dmv.com/~iceland
See our draft articles on: http://home.dmv.com/~eheite/index.html
|
|
|